____

7.24.2010

“The Sound and Savor” of Words: Lewis on the Art of Writing

by David Downing
I recently received a student essay explaining that “immigration, taxation, and economic exploitation have contributed to polarization across our nation.” Apart from its broad generalizing, the essay was clearly not written to be read aloud. Its rat-a-tat prose assaults the ear as if it were composed by an unlikely committee of bureaucrats and hip hop artists. I think if this student delves into the works of C.S. Lewis, it will not only stimulate his intellect and enrich his imagination; it will also improve his writing style.

C. S. Lewis published nearly forty books in his life-time, most of which are still in print. Apart from his Narnia Chronicles, which continue to sell millions of copies a year, Lewis distinguished himself in many genres—memoir, essays, poetry, allegory, literary criticism, philosophical analysis, fantasy, and historical fiction. So when Lewis took time to comment on the art of writing, his observations are well worth considering.

As he became increasingly renowned in his later years, Lewis was inundated with letters on just about every topic imaginable—from spiritual direction to Spinoza to spelling. He did his best to answer as many letters as he could, though this became an onerous task. Lewis explained to one correspondent that he had answered 35 letters that day; on a different occasion, he noted that he had spent 14 hours that day catching up on his correspondence (CL 2, 509; 3, 1152).

Lewis was a diligent reader of writing samples submitted to him, both from close friends and from complete strangers. He offered general evaluative remarks, but also comments on specific lines and particular word choices. Sometimes he replied by offering a quick primer on the art of writing. To a little girl from Florida he offered these five principles:

“Always try to use the language so as to make quite clear what you mean, and make sure your sentence couldn’t mean anything else.”
“Always prefer the plain direct word to the long, vague one. Don’t say implement promises, but keep them.”
Never use abstract nouns when concrete ones will do. If you mean ‘more people died,’ don’t say ‘mortality rose.’
“Don’t use adjectives which merely tell us how you want us to feel about the thing you are describing.” Under this heading, Lewis goes on to say that the writing should delight readers, not just label an event delightful; or it should make them feel terror, not just to learn that an event was terrifying. He says that emotional labeling is really just a way of asking readers, ‘Please, will you do my job for me?’
“Don’t use words that are too big for the subject.” Lewis illustrates this point by saying if you use infinitely as an intensifier instead of the simple word very, you won’t have any word left when you need to describe something that is truly infinite. (CL, 3, 766).

Lewis recommended these same principles to many other correspondents. He frequently emphasized that one’s writing should be simple, clear, concrete, and jargon-free. He also reiterated that one should Show, not Tell, that writers should capture sensory impressions and evoke emotions instead of simply offering an emotional label for what the reader is supposed to feel.

Lewis also believed that one should always write for the ear as well as for the eye. He recommended that a piece of prose be read aloud, to make sure that its sounds reinforce its sense. In discussing Greek and Latin texts, he said it wasn’t enough to work out the literal meaning of the lines; the translator should also recognize the “sound and savor of the language” (CL 1, 422).

Most certainly, Lewis felt the same way about English prose. To his friend Arthur Greeves, for example, he defined style as “the art of expressing a given thought in the most beautiful words and rhythms of words.” To illustrate, he offered first this phrase: “When the constellations which appear at early morning joined in musical exercises and the angelic spirits loudly testified to their satisfaction.” Then he gave the actual phrase as it appears in the King James Bible: “When the morning stars sang together and all the sons of God shouted for joy” (Job 38:70).

Lewis’s advice on writing is worth studying partly because he was so eminently successful in practicing what he preached. Lewis’s reputation shows no sign of diminishing nearly a half century after his death in 1963. His Narnia Chronicles continue as perennial best-sellers, and they have been hailed in The Oxford Companion to Children’s Literature as “the most sustained achievement in fantasy for children by a 20th-century author.” Lewis’s books of popular theology continue to enjoy widespread influence and appeal. And, to this reader, turning to most contemporary critics after reading Lewis’s scholarly work is like (in his own phrase) “tinsel after diamonds.” (CL 2, 247).

---------------------------------

Downing has written four books on C. S. Lewis. He currently serves as a consulting editor for Christian Scholars Review, Christianity and Literature, and Seven: An Anglo-American Literary Review. Downing's next book Looking For the King: An Inklings Novel will be published by Ignatius Press in October 2010. His college website may be found at http://users.etown.edu/d/downindc/)

12 comments:

Sharon Kirby said...

I really enjoyed your article!
I had the distinct pleasure of being a student of yours at Westmont College in 1977. I remember you for your witty sense of humor, and the depth of your insights. What a pleasure to know that you continue to love my favorite author, C.S. Lewis. As far as I'm concerned, Lewis "set the standard" on effective writing that touches the soul. Thank you for affirming that opinion in your article. ASLAN LIVES!

typewriter heather said...

One of the things I love most about his writing is it manages to be so conversational. He is aware of his audience and aware of himself, and that shows.

Devin Brown said...

Thanks for a very fine article. These are good words to remember.

Another maxim from Lewis worth noting is his suggestion that names of fictional characters “ought to be beautiful and suggestive” and “not merely odd.” Anyone who has read a novel where the author has NOT followed this principle will heartily agree.

Lewis obeyed this guideline with nearly all of his characters, and thus we have unforgettable names like Mr. Tumnus, Caspian, Reepicheep, and Trufflehunter.

Subscribbler said...

Thanks for sharing these great comments on writing by Lewis. I wish he'd written more about the craft of writing outside his letters, but then, would he? As a tutor, it had to be a temptation. Was there a reluctance to presume this kind of authority, to write about writing professionally?

But then, maybe I shouldn't wish for that. His clear voice, no doubt, was honed through his letter writing even though it was informal--or maybe BECAUSE it was informal. So, if asked if I'd rather have his letters or a book on writing, I'd have to admit that his letters probably did more work and I'm grateful to have them.

Carina said...

Classic writing truly endures, no?

Devin - my favourite name is "Puddleglum". How evocative!

poetreehugger said...

Oh, you must read Studies in Words, and An Experiment in Criticism. The first book is informative on words and their changing meanings.
The second book specifically addresses the reading experience, and how or even whether that personal experience should be guided or influenced by literary criticism. The first chapter had me gasping in delight at the description of the intensity of the love of reading. I was completely interested throughout the book, and satisfied with the concluding chapter's declaration of the mind-broadening role of literature, and the way it addresses the "wound" as well as the "privilege" of individuality.

Hans-Georg Lundahl said...

the essay was clearly not written to be read aloud. Its rat-a-tat prose assaults the ear as if it were composed by an unlikely committee of bureaucrats and hip hop artists.

Maybe the essay was written to be read aloud - by someone who nejoyed the hip hop artist (I even think those quoted lines are lines I have heard)?

David C. Downing said...

Carina: The name "Puddleglum" is funny in itself, but it is also an "inside joke." Lewis was working on his scholarly survey English Literature in the Sixteenth Century, Excluding Drama (1954) at the same time he was composing the Chronicles, and sometimes his scholarly work enlivened his creative work. For example, in his literary tome, Lewis mentioned a minor sixteenth-century poet named John Studley, whose word choices were sometimes unintentionally comical. Studley used terms such as “frostyface” and “topsy turvy” in passages meant to be serious, and he described the hellish river Styx as a “puddle glum.” Lewis said he couldn’t help but smile over the phrase. And he can’t help but make his readers smile when he turns it into the name of his morose Marshwiggle in The Silver Chair--Puddleglum.

Lee said...

My love of C. S. Lewis began much as his love of thought and books did. I discovered the world and meaning through books in my childhood. I found Lewis again in my 20's, and have ever after felt that he was my true mentor. I love most the idea that "No one knows what kind of machine you are trying to drive"(The Business of Heaven). When I cannot make sense of the world, and my spirituality seems archaic, I turn to Lewis.

Sungyak said...

thanks tons for the post.

Hans-Georg Lundahl said...

and puddle glum is a pretty synonym for wet blanket (phrase often used about him ...)

Speaking of Words: what do you say of rale/rail: post here, feel welcome to comment further, and anyone who has a FIRST edition of OED who could tell me in what senses spelling rale is asserted outside Scotland, feel free to do so! (George Pompidou library only has second edition)

camobel.com said...

I saw really much worthwhile data above!